No.3392. Semiotics ⇔ Mathematics as vi[x1, x2] ⇔ f[y1, y2]
- kyonissho
- Jan 11
- 3 min read
Updated: Jan 27
For example, with a verb "go" is used as
I "go" to the station.
Then the interval [from to] is given as verb interval vi,
vi[place 1, place 2].
These belong to language, logic and semiotics.
If the distance of place 1 and place 2 is 40km, and I can go the distance with 1 hour, the speed is 40km/h.
This belongs to science.
But only number can't mean e.g. your boyfriend/girlfriend in the station.
We need the both.
I try to show an instance
vi[x1, x2] ⇔ f[y1, y2],
here f means function.
![Fig.1.0. vi[ב (beth),ב (beth)] → vi[א (aleph), [ ] (naught)] as semiotics.](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a1ed3c_7f5ac24770764985a114d8b0cae6b474~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_980,h_735,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/a1ed3c_7f5ac24770764985a114d8b0cae6b474~mv2.jpg)

Hugo Ball's grave is near Hermann Hesse's grave in the St.Abbondio's graveyard.
Hugo Ball had led Dadaïsme and was Hermann Hesse's friend.
"Dada" sounds "kids with toy," including glass beads.
Dadaïsme was precursor of Surrealism, as one of my proposal, the advanced Lacan's psychoanalysis with language system to the advanced postmodern with mathematics toward cosmic realization.
Then semiotics ⇔ mathematics is approached.
For
[ f(y1),
[vi(x1) ⊥ f(y2)]
vi(x2)] ,

Fig.1.2:
Σ(F-0)^d = Σ(F+0)^d = Σ(F-p)^d = Σ(F+p)^d, although
spinning F+0 = F+p → {0, 10, 100, ... , ∞+0} (complement),
spinning F-0 = F-p → {0, 0, 0, ... , 0} .
Then,
any space x ≠ any space y
from {space 1, space 2, ... , space ∞},
because i0 = i0 exists at
coordinates x ≠ coordinates y, 0 → [0, 0],
F0 = any Fp exists,
although the differences from F0 ≠ Fpx ≠ Fpy
exists at {space 1, space 2, ... , space ∞}.
From the space differences,
the = ∧ ≠, T, generates
pure energy via {space 1, space 2, ... , space ∞}
of [i0, [0, 0]].
Link:
No.3389 and 3391. An Instance of Pure Energy via the Solved Goldbach Conjecture.


In case of matrix method (Buddhist and Hindu may call the matrix method as Mantra).
B-2 ((3)) is object-materialization to be ,
B-3 ((4)) is object-leap [of being materialized] to been.

With fig.1.0 and 1.1, I sought the figured space as the cosmic landscape via my remembrance.
This time, I applied one law of Hilbert space (the basic of the classical quantum physics) with trigonometric functions.
With the trigonometric functions calculated with wxMaxima, the [ (naught), curve] fits (the trigonometric functions are not single set).

What is the naught space?
I saw the spectrum with science,

The spectrum tends to cluster of +, because the former mathematics's - × - = +, there is no - × - = -, but + = - × - or + = + × +.
Further more, we misunderstand as fig.4 fig.5 and fig.6 are same behind vi[vision 1, vision 2].



As above visions, I saw the providence from unknown to known (LORD leads),
vi[unknown, known] via f[-^2 = -, [ ]]
( [ ] means naught here).
Below is today's note.
(1) Global oil concession vs. CO2 emission right,
(2) proxy wars by big powers vs. human shield by terrorists,
(3) mortal engage enthusiasm vs. now from post mortal engages.
(1)~(3) make us see different visions.
(4) Israel signed for Somaliland's independence.
(5) Greek, Cyprus and Israel did a joint war game in the eastern Mediterranean.
(6) Syria made an agreement to exchange military information and to have economic relation with Israel.
(7) (4)~(6) make me understand that
[Mediterranean sea, Red sea, Indian sea] route,
(8) the route means naturally the security and economic benefit of India, Australia and New Zealand,
further more,
(9) Canada which has made new contracts with 80 countries sice 2025 will have the benefit for the security and the economy. Then Canada will be able to contribute for the Arctic sea's security with the required security and money.
(7)~(9) mean great progress to solve (1)~(3).
I stand with Israel.
(C) Copyright 2026 Kiyom Nishio (Kyo Nissho). All rights reserved.


Comments