The zero of life/existence dimension of any reason concept

1. As a comparison.

Roman abacus before the zero cognition.

Fig.1.0.Copy of a Roman abacus Photographer: Mike Cowlishaw (aus der englischen Wikipedia)

Fig.1.1. ref. FROM ZERO TO INFINITY by CONSTANCE REID

In case of abacus, if each digit is made with the dimension, then the zero is included. e.g. if each digit is made with {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}, then 0 is mechanically included, i.e. when no bead is moved.

2. For the next giant leap.

The first scheme method for the zero of life/existence dimension of any reason concept, as the transcendence, with inner reflexive (lower right of each set) and outer reflexive (upper right of each set).

Fig.2. The first scheme method of the Glass Bead Game in 2011. See fig.4.2 for the essence.

When man/woman uses reflexive ability, {space, time, concept ∈ dimensions} is realized from a-priori ability of human existence, then some of realized dimension are effecting nature as given a-priori by human interactively. The a-priories (a-priori: see after fig.6.0) are existence as nature/cosmos, therefore the outer/inner reflexives’ set in the twelve lines composing the first scheme method is phenomenon (*a1, cf. mathematics is phenomenon), the zero exists here. The a-priori follows a purpose, the change derives a function (the first set) and is derived your action (the second set *a2), then the life/existence zero was formed in the three sets of inner/outer reflexive in 1996.

*a1: the a-priories as your ability are existence, and in reflexive, you are projecting the existence to nature/cosmos, it becomes a phenomenon. To the projection, the outer/inner reflexives’ twelve lines are realized as phenomenon in the zero and it is from form to matter (the first set), from matter to form (the second set), and the intuition of reason ability (the third set) when any category in reflexive is responded by a suitable category in new reflexive to the former reflexive (ref. fig.5. Cf. a model referring Walter Benjamin).

*a2: in Lao-tzu, compared with form to matter in the first set, of the second set 1 derives 2, 2 derives 3 … as an extension is given as matter to form. E.g. one of the symbolic matter is ”水 (water)”, then number of practical extension can exist; matter, then the insight of 道 (Tao) exists; principle as 無 (nothing).

For example, also {1 + 1 = 2} is applied; any item} of the first scheme method, then the inner reflexive and the outer reflexive behave on the realized measurement, the {1 + 1 = 2} is found as {reality; a reason concept}.the zero before {1 + 1 = 2 applied;} derives the realization, the synthesis. I call this as “existence reaction.”And the inner reflexive and the outer reflexive are connected on the lower left and the upper left.(here, “;” is from/to/on …, i.e. all preposition, “{}” means element of set.)

Fig.3.0. The notarized document, "the realization of the Glass Bead Game II."

Fig.3.0:

In the notarized document, "the realization of the Glass Bead Game II," the first scheme method has been described with text.

Fig.3.1.

Fig.3.2.

Fig.3.3.

Fig.3.4.

Fig.3.5.

Fig.3.6.

Fig.3.7. The notarized document, "the realization of the Glass Bead Game I."

Fig.3.7:

In the notarized document, "the realization of the Glass Bead Game I," it has been described that any realization arises at same time when God think anything, and humankind isn't the existence, then what humankind can do.

Fig.3.8.

Fig.3.9.

Fig.3.9:

"2. Naika" is "2. 内家," 内家 (inside house/party) means 道家 (Taoism party). Cf. 外家 (outside house/party) includes 仏家 (Buddhist party) and e.g. Uyghurs' Islam (回教 in Chinese character) are famous.

"5. Gogyou" is "5. 五行," the Five Lines of Ying-Yang Five Lines.

Fig.3.10.

Fig.3.11.

Fig.3.12.

Fig.3.13. The notarized document, "the realization of the Glass Bead Game III."

Fig.3.14.

Fig.3.15.

Fig.3.16.

Fig.3.17.

Fig.3.18. The notarized document, "the realization of the Glass Bead Game IIIb."

Fig.3.19.

Fig.3.20.

Fig.3.21.

Fig.3.22.

Fig.3.23.

Fig.3.0~3.23:

{scheme methods; brain space not used yet}

{generated reality; [ ] (omitted the Almighty yet not seen)}

Fig.4.0. The red line: the outer reflexive, the blue line: the inner reflexive.

Fig.4.1. {{the first scheme method’s replace-ability/vibration-relation}set ⇄ {existence reaction; 1st_reflexive → nth_reflexive}set} | set; ∞

Fig.4.2. Essence of the first scheme method. And solution of the three sets, especially the difference of the third set.

Fig.4.2:

(1)

True reason concept is unable to describe because it is the transcendental existence of fig.4.3. Usually the transcendental existence is called as God in the New Testament, the fixed name is withheld in the Hebrew Bible (the Old Testament). Therefore the first scheme method's solution is no threshold path to any realization from the undescribed transcendental existence, there is the transcendental existence and the practice makes any path be no threshold. Any player can reach higher transcendence, any detailed existence or reality.

(2)

The inverse (at the right side) of the third set is compared with the first set and the second set as the requirement of {a-priori<<, a-posteriori from generation} of the two Bibles and {a-posteriori<<, a-priori from nothingness} of Taoism.

Here a-priori means "existing before experience" and a-posteriori means "existing after experience."

The peculiarities of the first set and the second set make

(a) [{generality⇦, a-priori → a-posteriorit}, {generality⇦, a-posteriori → a-priori}set]interval,

and the third set makes with (a)

(b) [generality⇦, generality⇦]interval → ubiquitous antecedent,

then (a) and (b) make

(c) [ubiquitous_transcendency_(reason concept, love, freedom and eternal life), ⇨any_peculiarity]interval → force,

(c)'s another expression is

(d) [[ ], ⇨any_peculiarity], then [[ ]⇦, any force].

⇦ and ⇨ mean reflexive here, and → means implication of logic, [ ] means omission including any omitted verb.

Fig.4.3. How the perfect language exceeds any threshold and progresses transcendental origin (Genesis).

Fig.4.3:

The origin deriving the source (God) exists "here and everywhere," "now and eternal time to future and to past" and etc. of any peculiarity and universality at same time of any reason concept (transcendental concept), i0 (Imaginary 0) is required to prove the materialization.

Then reflexive of reflexive of ... of reflexive is{ ⇦×infinite, ⇦×infinite-1, ... , ⇦×2, ⇦×1, ⇦×0 (no reflexive)},then at each time of reflexive is used, the upper reaches' reason should be found, although the upper reaches are aimed at there is no threshold and the upper reaches exist in unused part/domain of brain.Then there is another question. Humankind's life exist in the 50% energy and 50% material state. If the state is called as ψ of the linearly independent, how we close to φ. Therefore i0 should be discovered, I've discovered i0, I believe the ether body of Jesus Christ is there where is ubiquity and eternity vast over ψ's Cosmos.

If the second scheme method is applied for fig.4.4, for example ...

Fig.4.4. Not existed is invisible ever.

Fig.4.4:

I took my brain's CT scan photograph in 2015. My brain was already fully developed of all part with no remaining space in my cranium. My IQ was 186 in 1986, but my thinking ability became to x100 faster until 2005, and the progress doesn't yet stop.

We dreamed to fly, it became to the airplane. We wanted to have clairvoyance, it became to the telecommunications, and etc.. We couldn't imagine the next?

Now as above we have other future, one of it is to release all potential of religious contexts to which we didn't awaken, and another of it is that each individual evolves by own intention (for this, when I'm practicing the symbol method, I'm also remembering Lacan's subconscious to be realized toward any expression but with full potential of Cosmos).

What will the released miracles with Lord and the self-evolution with own intention based on each DNA's uniqueness become to? It will each DNA's generation of dimension to energy, each mutual relation of the people's progress means the support of miracle from other dimension to energy (e.g. If your DNA makes an engine and another DNA makes the drives including transmission, it will become a car. But each probability is just once with his/her life because nobody has same DNA).

Also here peculiarity (own evolution) and universality (miracle's releasing) exist at same time, then what we want to experience will be extension of self through/toward eternal and ubiquitous existence (Cosmos' all change or God) and will be the realization of vast truth.

See fig.4.3 again for the reference.

Fig.4.5. One of application of the second scheme method for fig.4.4's content.

Fig.4.5:

Our brain is the organ to regenerate Cosmos. We were/are using the symbols including alphabet, mathematics' and music's symbols and etc. in order to regenerate Cosmos. It means that the symbols our ancestors have created are originally the initial magic symbol, the second's approach is e.g.

{vav⇦⇦, yud⇦, aleph, ⇨ ... } of Hebrew expression with no verb,

{x⇦⇦, +⇦, y, ⇨=, ... } of mathematics. (See fig.4.6.)

The second scheme method is possible to link to any initial magic symbol and approaches toward the symbol method, although the second scheme method doesn't yet reach to the symbol method of Genesis language.

Fig.4.6. No.3089.

Fig.4.6:

If you think a new field of mathematics with 1-i and 1-ii, I believe that you have an interesting with fig.4.6 as my proportion.

The third set of the first scheme method is previously placed at any reflexive of the first set and the second set as existence reaction because

(e) {reflexive of reflexive of reflexive of ... (infinite transition based on unaware cause)} is essentially based on {reflexive's existence itself as transcendency → effect based on unused brain's space (room)} where you listen calling to recover fortune or to inspire Lord miracle from.

(f) I needed the discovery of the first set and second set in order to prove (e), and I met Ayao Ide who translated the novel Glass Bead Game, whom Verdienstorden der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Merit-Order of the Republic Germany) was given. At December 13, 1987, I was 22 year old.Fortunately the inspiration of the third set came me at 19 year old (See fig.13.0 and 13.1). It was before my study for the realization of the Glass Bead Game.

I explain the orthodox reflexive briefly.

We sense objects in phenomena with a-priori ability, and give a form as law to reproduce the phenomena of nature. And we reply a-priori ability in the reflexive to nature including the observed phenomena, i.e. practicing hope or materialization from our a-priori ability to nature. For example our ancestor observed the sun or the moon as objects, and got a calendar about in B.C. 3500, after this they replied their a-priori ability, e.g. space-time and number, to cultivated and sowed toward ”before a harvest (the phenomena)”, then the first industrial revolution began.

At first, you observed the world, as the second, you project your a-priori ability to “before the phenomena” as a covenant, because there is no harvest yet but you believe it will come, i.e. the projection of your existence will come to change.

The advanced reflexive has been achieved as the first scheme method, as realized the new zero, any linkage appears as

(1) the first set,

{space, time, number}set on the outer-reflexive, {category}set on the inner-reflexive, in form→matter,

(2) the second set,

{path, progress}set on the outer-reflexive, {connection between nature and yourself}set on the inner-reflexive, in matter→form,

(3) the third set is in order to derive the intuition of reason, the figure to complement is fig.5,

the realization.

Fig.5.0a. Cf. a model referring Walter Benjamin

Referrer below article for fig.5:The reason intuition, ref. Kant category.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/the-reason-intuition-ref-kant-category

I realized the first scheme method in 1996, and began the practice alone, then almost all times I practiced, many appearances of each scheme were “what I’ve already known” at first 50 times, i.e. it was the combination of the intuition of sense and understanding, and of my already obtained experience. After this path, the intuition of reason toward unknown began, the simple expression is above fig.5a Cf. a model referring Walter Benjamin, and in fact I used the three step scheme when I was busy, it was about 150 times.I compare the reflexive of a reflexive is the reason intuition with Joseph, the dream interpreter, of Genesis 40-5.

Fig.5.0b. Genesis 40, Verse 5.

Fig.5.0c. Genesis 40, Verse 5.

Fig.5.0d. Genesis 40, Verse 5.

Fig.5.1. fig.2.0. development done by Kyo Nissho (Kiyom Nishio); from Walter Benjamin to the first scheme method.

fig.5.1 has been described in

The reason intuition, ref. Kant category.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/the-reason-intuition-ref-kant-category

Fig.5.2. how the zero is.

Fig.5.3. the beads definition (1).

Fig.5.4. the beads definition (2).

And refer

From Schemes to Magic Symbols.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/from-schemes-to-magic-symbols

Here we refer a-priori and a-posteriori.

a-priori: existing before experience, form belongs to a-priori in Kant philosophy.a-posteriori: emerged since experience, matter belongs to a-posteriori in Kant philosophy.

Fig.6.0. I studied Kant philosophy, 30 minutes per day with Japanese edition, from 1988 to 1993.

Fig.6.1. Ref. Kant: Die inne Zweckmäßigkeit (the inner appropriateness), die objective Zweckmäßigkeit (the actual appropriateness). These were the entrance of the inner/outer reflexive.

Ref.As for Zweck + mäßig + keit, below.

Zweck

1. purpose

2. 2. (Sinn) point

3. - Oxford German-English Dictionary -

-mäßig

1. drückt in Bildungen mit Substantiven aus, dass die beschriebene Person oder Sache vergleichbar mit jemandem,. etwas ist.

2. drückt in Bildungen mit Substantiven aus, dass die beschriebene Person oder Sache auf etwas basiert, beruht, einer Sache folgt aufgrund von etwas:

3. drückt in Bildungen mit Substantiven aus, dass einer Sache gemäß gehandelt o. Ä. wird; wie es etwas verlangt, vorsieht:

4. bezeichnet in Bildungen mit Substantiven etwas als Mittel oder Ursache; mithilfe von, durch etwas:

5. (UGS.) kennzeichnet in Bildungen mit Substantiven die Zugehörigkeit zu diesen; etwas betreffend, in Bezug auf etwas:- DUDEN -

-keit… bildet mit bestimmten Adjectiven die entsprechenden Substantive, die dann einen Zustand, eine Beschaffenheit, Eigenschaft ausdrücken: …

- DUDEN -

Fig.7.0. With the abacus (the first scheme method).

When I was 21 year old, my IQ was 186. Now I feel it’s over regarded 340 (naturally IQ is a distribution between 0 and 200), because any unused brain area can be active with the inner/outer reflexive of the life/existence zero, and it can be with art, sports, or any kind of brain activity with the zero.

Now I’m approaching to make imaginary number space multiply quantum biology, naturally the symbol method’s study is also progressing, the second/third scheme method’s reapplication too.

Human kind will discover new horizon since the life/existence zero, the perfect language which Abraham inspired in after the Babel.

Fig.7.1. R^d application referring (0 ∧ n)

Fig.7.2. existence reaction, and the rest explanation of the second scheme method.

fig.7.2:

Existence reaction (e with dot) makes each 0 of form and matter, and each 0 of outer and inner, exist in a center and on a surface at same time ((4) for (1)), i.e. finite and infinite at same time. But possible experience emerges or arises there, Abraham's prophecy, the perfect language, achieves there.

δ and σ are the rest explanation of the second scheme method, although brief.

Fig.7.3. the three point interval [0, 0, e].

fig.7.3:

The three point interval [0, 0, e], finite (realization) and infinite (ubiquity) at same moment.

Cf. Hesse's inspiration as "the vibration; [inside, outside], [spirit, nature]".

Fig.8.0. “Perot konstruierte sich, nach dem Vorbild naiver Kugelzählapparate für Kinder, einen Rahmen mit einigen Dutzend Drähten darin, auf welchen er Glasperlen von verschiedener Größe, Form und Farbe aneinanderreihen konnte (Perot constructed himself, to the model of a ingenuous sphere count apparatus for kids, a framework with united dozen wires within there, on which he could tacks glass beads of different size, form and color to think of each other,)” a historian about in 23rd century described so in the novel Glass Bead Game.

Fig.8.1. Any center is 0 from the surface of sphere.

Fig.8.2.

In order to close a far zero of zero step synthesis, we can obtain the newly generated first scheme method with the second scheme method. I’ll write for the initial second scheme method in other articles.

Also [0, 0] is any dimensional plane; outer/inner reflexives; life/dimensional zero.

Fig.8.3. how [0, 0] distance is thought.

As reproduction ability, we can derive 1 from an apple, but we need a definition if we derive something from 1. For example,

kind: apple

color: green

weight: middle

number: 1

A symbol as with the first scheme method needs a definition via the outer/inner reflexive which include {space, time, number, concept, … , path, an instance of reason intuition}set, and the set will make a chain (fig.8.2), then an beginning of the chain derives x0 zero.

x∞ is so far, and the amount that will be synthesized including x0 (of a0, b0, … z0 for example) will be too much vast, then the symbol method is required to reach fast and direct.

Fig.9.0. Focusing Hebrew consonant

Fig.9.1. Chinese character is ideogram, and the application in combinated meanings derives insight to practice vast potential realities, Chinese tried to practice the variations especially on the five basic books in several thousand years.

My achievement with Kant philosophy has been written on my notarized document of the first, but the document was stolen in 2012. I will restore the document from the ink-ribbon of my old printer in USA, and will walk in sun light. I haven’t been able to get out from my room five years.

In the World War II, over 300,000 American soldier died to fight with the great Japan Empire. The over 300,000 American are opening a way through where I will leave Japan forever, because of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. I never forget this.

Fig.10. Practicing no.2400 with the first scheme method.

Fig.11. Since 1996, water-blue beads for fixed coordinates, yellow beads for changing coordinates, blue beads for principle, read beads for life/matter, green beads for technology/technique. If different way is took, with the second scheme method is better.

Now I’m doing verification of the second and third scheme method again, these are becoming greater. And practicing the symbol method.

Fig.12.0. Continuing no2400. And planning for the Glass Bead Game.

Fig.12.1. [0, 0]interval -> the ubiquitous places

Fig.12.1:

Of p-q, p=1, p=2, p=3 are structured with the inner reflexive q=2 and the outer reflexive q=4, and the equal structure of p=1, p=2, p=3 belongs to any synthesis; the cognition q=2 and q=4; [0, 0]interval in the synthesis cognition.

Fig.12.2. the locations change and the vibration; [0, 0]interval.

Fig.12.2:

When a synthesis is done, the effect exists; [0, 0]interval, and the items can be changed the locations. Then inside the effect will be observed; [0, 0]interval -> the inner/outer reflexives of {space-time, number, category}set, and often will derive a new synthesis.

Fig.12.3. a practice of ubiquitous places for example.

Fig.12.4. of reason progress, 0; {+1, -1}.

Fig.12.4:

(1-i) is the reason intuition model from the inner/outer reflexive.

(1-ii) refers Walter Benjamin's reason intuition idea.

(2) what the third set is made from and does.

Fig.12.5. {bead, dimension⇦} ∨ {bead⇦, dimension}.

In order to study natural human potentials, of the twelve lines of the first scheme method, I applied the Napoleon Hill program (*b) to the first set, Lao-tzu to the second set, and the third set is my original. At same time I composed the twelve lines with the inner/actual appropriateness (die inne/objective Zweckmäßichkeit) of Kant.

When you apply the first scheme method, recollect your potential; the twelve lines from zero to realization. If any item itself of the twelve items is changed (e.g. symbol) in order to project the inheritance of your country's culture and civilization to any realization with your synthesis method, then the straight causality sequence’s change will be required, and then an occurred problem will may lead you, although there is the second scheme method to any newly generated first scheme method.

*b

While I researched about pragmatism, I found the Napoleon Hill program some information of Freemason. I applied the introduction of the novel Glass Bead Game the 2R2A (recognise, relate, assimilate, apply).

Fig.12.6. fig.1.

Fig.12.7.

Fig.12.6. fig.1. and fig.12.7:

The understanding direction is from (3) to (1), the application/practice direction of divergence, convergence, and sublation is from (1) to (3). As inversion of it, the thinking of (3) to (1) derives "before (1) as (0)" and the truth exists "before (1) as (0)." It is "空 (emptiness before emptiness in Buddhism," then emptiness is presence, presence is emptiness. And "before (1) as (0)" is "道 (Tao before nothingness and presence in Taoism." Then (1)~(3) as divergence and convergence are paths of (4).

The first set of the first scheme method takes any progress from (4) to (1) of fig.12.6 fig.1, (4) leads an advanced phase after (3). It is from a-priori (before experience) to a-posteriori (after experience), from form to matter).

The second set of the first scheme method takes any progress from (0) to (3) of fig.12.6 fig.1. (0) leads an advanced phase after (1). It is from a-posteriori to a-priori, this "from matter to form" is that "how to use your life/existence (experience control)" will meet "essence; ubiquitous principle". Chinese have this in their culture.

Link of fig.12.6. fig.1:Divergence, Convergence, Sublation.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/divergence-convergence-sublation

Link for a newly generated first scheme method:No.2440, the newly generated first scheme method from no.2339, the theme not found yet.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/no-2440-the-newly-generated-first-scheme-method-from-no-2339-the-theme-not-found-yet-kabbalah-go

Fig.12.8.

Fig.12.8:

Difference of pragmatism between West and China.

With reason intuition, constructive intuition and sensing intuition, the both pragmatism are

West: from sensing intuition in effect to reason intuition; meeting God, the first set of the twelve strings (the first scheme method),

China: from constructive intuition over practice to reason intuition; Ying-Yang appear, the second set of the twelve strings (the first scheme method).

Link:

Studying Quantum Biology 2

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/studying-quantum-biology-2

Fig.12.9 (fig.1 of the linked page).

Link:

No.2525. The applied Ein Sof (אין סף).

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/no-2525-the-applied-ein-sof-%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9F-%D7%A1%D7%A3

Fig13.0. “Existence”. I inscribed this board by myself when I was 19 year old, in 1985.

This is the beginning of the third set of the first scheme method.

Fig.13.1. “All and every existence is beautiful as it exists. N. Nissyo 19 years old.”

Before I met Ayao Ide who translated the novel Glass Bead Game into Japanese, when I was electrical engineering student, privately I studied Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Greek philosophy. I had read almost all Hesse’s books except the Glass Bead Game, because it was out of print in Japan. I received the original German edition and the translated edition from Ayao Ide in 1988 after I graduated the institute of technology.

Link and the figure from the linked page:

Fig.13.2. one of the figures as referring from the linked page below.

e: Existence Reaction (no.2502).

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/e-existence-reaction-no-2502

Fig.14.0.0. the first scheme method; {0 <-> phenomenon/realization}.

Fig.14.0.1. {description; 0} and {0 -> any phenomenon} for example, as with Kant philosophy for fig.14.0.0.

Fig.14.0.1. for example of fig.14.0.0:

Reason concept (transcendental concept) is infinite but can be described for part. The description as instance of transcendency and {phenomenon; outer reflexive, inner reflexive} are being realized to reach the infinity of reason concept as {description; 0} and {0 -> any phenomenon}, for example as fig.14.0.1.

Fig.14.0.2. The 3rd set of the Glass Bead Game as reflexive to the 1st set and the 2nd set. See fig.13.2 again.

Materials like beads or stones, pigments and something to describe Ein Sof (אין סף: there is no threshold), and naturally life in spirit to react, which could used in Abraham age were required as best. And the best came in 1996.

Fig.14.0.3a.

Fig.14.0.3b.

Link of the second scheme method:

No.2027. And the Initial Second Scheme Method from 2013 to 2016, for Music.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/no-2027-and-the-initial-second-scheme-method-from-2013-to-2016-for-music

Glass beads are used as free axes, here the yellow is defined as {in_change ∈ "\"}, i.e. the yellow is \ (unset) in change, the water-blue is defined as {stable ∈ "\"}, i.e. the water-blue is \ (unset) of stable, as following fig.5.4, although the probe will be continued until it will be achieved, e.g. for fig.14.0.1,

Fig.14.0.4.

Fig.14.0.4 is transformed as

Fig.14.0.5

[big ○ (although not exist here), big ●]interval -> the phenomenon, it is from

Fig.14.0.6.

Fig.14.0.7.

Fig.14.0.7:

[small unexisted ○, small unexisted ○]interval are proben the existence by the peculiarities of [small ○, small ○, small ○] and [small ○, small ○, small ○]. Then, as in this instance, [0, phenomenon] and [0, (universality → peculiarity)] make transcendental concept over the threshold loss with inner-reflexive and outer-reflexive become real existence. Compare with fig.14.0.1 and fig.14.0.4, and see how the transcendental concept becomes reality.

Fig.14.0.8. analysis of fig.14.0.7

Fig.14.0.9. advantage from fig.14.0.7

God create man with giving spirit into quantum field, then the intellect is being developed as

Fig.14.1. {0 <-> phenomenon/realization}; unused brain part in life.

Fig.14.2. prayer to activate your spirit to reach aether body (Jesus Christ).

Fig.14.3. φ at aether body, as an instance.

E = mc^2, {purest Uranium 3 gram -> c^2} becomes Hiroshima scale nuclear explosion.How many is your weight? You are always in {m <-> c^2} between life and aether body. You in the energy is beyond your imagination.

I have my 50 years plan or 100 million years plan, naturally my lifetime is about 100 years as longest.Although of it, my subconscious reacts the time interval, and while I'm sleeping, while my mental block is weakening, my full imagination is called by Creation, a new page is described soon when I awake (i.e. I'm studying while I'm sleeping).

When my life will end, but the power the flooding will never end forever.

Don't leave, listen the calling, live your miracle from Creation.

(The first post on kyonissho.com/kyos-blog was July 15, 2021)

(C) Copyright 2021~2024 Kyo Nissho (Kiyom Nishio). All rights reserved.