As Experimentation of Thinking, "No Winner Casinos" fund Any Primary Fund.
As an experimentation of thinking:
People were forced to a gamble, and there is no winner.
The people are forced to pay the bet x 10 x 2 [as the market scale which is assumed with the total bets' amount with no winner].
I'm not law specialist, therefor as my personal opinion, although according to the books, the contracts are invalid from the date when the contracts had made.
But if the "no winner Casinos" fund any primary fund, and the Casinos themselves didn't/don't bet the "no winner Casino."
I'm not sure of what will happen.
(C) Copyright 2026 Kiyom Nishio (Kyo Nissho). All rights reserved.

Comments