No.2446; Genesis 1-1 and Genesis 2-3.

1.

I practice to seek potential generation from Genesis 1-1 and 2-3.

Fig.1.0. Genesis 1-1.

Fig.1.2. Genesis 2-3.

Fig.1.3. Genesis 2-3, 2-4.

Fig.1. no.2446; Genesis 1-1.

Fig.2. no.2446; Genesis 1-1.

Fig.3. no2446; Genesis 2-3.

Fig.4. no.2446; Genesis 2-3.

Fig.5. no.2446.

2.

[Genesis 1-1, Genesis 2-3]interval -> {inverse energy; to awake}set; to be materialized:

Fig.6.0.

Fig.6.1.

Any inverse of energy can be used to restore a ratio for unknown, be connected with 0s of the first scheme method.

Here, we can think power the flooding with any ratio to reflexive; unknown.

And we now know music and mathematics have the common denominator.

As reference, usually we think the universe with the inverse square law, of 1/(R^2) as inverse energy.

Why 1/(R^d) (d ≥ 3) is so difficult to observe? See fig.7.

Fig.7.0.

Fig.7.1.

Fig.7.0 (7) <- (6), fig.7.1:

π is as an example.

Link:

Not against the Duplicated Leverages, but from the Two Points Observation of Any Potential Energy.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/not-against-the-duplicated-leverages-but-from-the-two-points-observation-of-any-potential-energy

3.

(i) How to think the Kant philosophy for the reason intuition.

Ref.:

The reason intuition, ref. Kant category.

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/the-reason-intuition-ref-kant-category

Fig.8.0. fig.2.1. and referring the predecessor, Kant Philosophy.

Fig.8.0:

ref. The zero of life/existence dimension of any reason concept fig.5. Cf. a model referring Walter Benjamin

https://www.kiyomnishio.com/post/the-zero-of-life-existence-dimension-of-any-reason-concept

Then how is from a category to another category in fig.2 (of the linked article), as referring Kant philosophy,

Fig.8.1. fig.3.

fig.8.1:

1.

Quantität der Urteile: quantity of the judgement

(1) Allgemeine: general

(2) Besondere: special

(3) Einzelne: individual

2.

Qualität: quality

(1) Bejahende: affirmative

(2) Verneinende: rejecting

(3) Unendliche: infinite

3.

Relation: relation

(1) Kategorische: categorical

(2) Hypothetische: hypothetical

(3) Disjunktive: disjunctive

4.

Modalität: provision

(1) Problematische: problematic[al]

(2) Assertorische (behauptend): maintainning

(3) Apodiktische: apodictic (necessarily or self-evidently true)

The reason intuition from reflexive to reflexive, {x⇦, y} means y reflexives x here, e.g.,

{1-(3) individual⇦, a child} -"a"-> {2-(3) infinite⇦, lasting nation}

the causality "a" belongs to power of love, love belongs to reason/transcendence concept.

{4-(1) problematic⇦, a criminal} -"b"-> {3-(3) disjunctive, lasting nation}

the causality "b" belongs to power of ruin, ruin means to end soon, and belongs to a finite concept.

(ii) How to apply this time's reason intuition.

{2-(3) infinite⇦, heaven⇦} -"c"-> {1-(1) general⇦, 0 as beginning}

the causality "c" is energy, the ubiquity derives lives.

{individual⇦, f(x)⇦ space-time} -"d"-> {2-(3) infinite⇦, heaven⇦}

the causality "d" requires that f(x) is ubiquitous, because ⇦ itself of the { , heaven⇦} is the reflexive of reflexive, i.e. the reason intuition should be ubiquitous with above 2, {heaven⇦⇦, 1/E, 0s} is in fact.

Also science should progress forever.

(The first post on kyonissho.com/kyos-blog was September 30, 2023.)

(C) Copyright 2025 Kyo Nissho (Kiyom Nishio). All rights reserved.